Skip to content
Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

LDS Inc. sets gold standard on reporting child abuse?

profxm, June 6, 2010March 11, 2021

I caught this article in the MormonTimes about the LDS Church being criticized by Marci Hamilton about its cover ups of child sexual abuse. I highly suggest your read Marci Hamilton’s article first, but I’ll give you the conclusion here:

Thus, the LDS Church has created essentially the same opaque system that the Catholic Church has employed when it comes to child sex abuse. While the polygamy, child brides, and sex abuse endemic to the polygamous sects are not permitted or encouraged by LDS, the structure of the organization, the importance of its self-image as a leader of virtue in the world, and its intent to protect the Church from liability have, together, yielded a cycle of abuse that is not at all unlike that which has been widely documented in the Roman Catholic Church.

So is there serious abuse in the LDS Church? Absolutely. Why don’t we know more about it? Because of the Church’s internal beliefs, rules, and the acquiescence of its believers just like in the case of the Roman Catholic Church. In addition, OUI charge in Boston mentions that the laws and precedents in Utah have served to cover it up very effectively. If there is one state in the United States that is anathema to lawyers representing child sex abuse victims because the odds of success are so low, it is Utah.

Those on the outside of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints are in the same position outsiders were in with respect to the Roman Catholic Church and clergy abuse before 2002, when the Boston Globe broke the cover story. I have no doubt that what I am saying will provoke defensive and even angry responses. I also know, having dealt with the Catholic Bishops for as long as I have, that there will be powerful temptations to attack me personally. So be it. But I sincerely hope it will also lead to real reforms that result in sunshine on dangerous practices and a reordering of priorities that will put their own vulnerable children atop the list of priorities.

Now the rebuttal in the MormonTimes article by Von G. Keetch, chief outside legal counsel for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints:

“The LDS Church has long had a highly effective approach for preventing and responding to abuse. In fact, no religious organization has done more. Although no one system is perfect and no single program will work with every organization, the LDS Church’s approach is the gold standard.”

Does anyone buy this statement from Keetch? If the Mormon approach is the “gold standard”, why are there no background checks on individuals who work with kids? Why is the Church losing court cases when sued over abuse? Why is the LDS Church still working with the Boy Scouts who have “secret files” on their leaders who are abusers? If the current policies of LDS Inc. are the “gold standard” for religions reporting abuse, the gold standard sucks!

Abuse crime

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Federal govt must investigate NOMs finances

September 24, 2009October 1, 2011

Guest post by Danielle Truszkovsky. BEFORE WRITING THIS column, I sat and stared at my computer screen for what seemed like ages trying to figure out a way to make the topic of IRS regulations seem a bit more interesting. Lets face it, most people just dont want to read…

Read More

You might be a member of a cult if…

September 8, 2009June 10, 2023

I don’t want to ghettoize this post by making it about Mormonism, but since that’s why we’re all here, it’s natural to gravitate to that. But this pertains to so much more than one group. I recently watched a video (not the best) that got me thinking about what it…

Read More

religion = $$$

March 14, 2009January 15, 2011

I know, it’s the most cynical interpretation of religion there is, but sometimes religions do things that just point so strongly to the money aspect that you can’t help but be cynical. Here’s a NYTimes article about religious leaders battling a bill in New York that would remove the statute…

Read More

Comments (7)

  1. kuri says:
    June 6, 2010 at 8:29 am

    Here’s Von Keetch’s full response and Hamilton’s response to his response.

  2. Joseph Smidt says:
    June 6, 2010 at 9:42 am

    I’m confused why you say there are no background checks. If you commit sexual abuse they put a permanent marking on your membership record (if you somehow avoid excommunication) which alerts leaders you cannot work around kids and furthermore, even if your record is clean, men cannot serve with children alone. They can only be working with kids if their spouse is present as well.

    At least, this is what is supposed to happen.

  3. profxm says:
    June 6, 2010 at 10:02 am

    A number of religions are now doing background checks on any potential leader or youth leader just to make sure they have never been accused or convicted of anything inappropriate. LDS Inc. is not and has not announced any plans to do this.

    The mark on the record is nice, but do they really follow through on that? You’re telling me every single calling is first vetted through the church’s database? Maybe. But I’m skeptical.

    The policy on a leader working with kids only if other people around seems nice, but it certainly wasn’t a policy when I was involved. In the 1980s and 1990s, I was heavily involved in scouts and church activities and we regularly had single individuals running meetings, etc. Ergo, this policy is either new or not strictly enforced.

  4. C.Biden says:
    June 6, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    COMPLETELY ANECDOTAL INFORMATION: My firm practices criminal defense. We represented many Mormon men who were accused of child abuse. Interestingly, that demographic was large compared to the actual number of Mormons in our region. Many defendants admitted that their behavior began while they were on a mission. The vast majority of perpetrators, however, were White Protestantns. We never defended a Catholic priest, thought.

    One phenomenon I found interesting was that almost as soon as they were charged, they were excommunicated. I think this practice gave TSCC plausible deniability.

  5. kuri says:
    June 6, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    profxm,

    The church has been implementing all kinds of new policies on abuse since about the mid-1990s. A “backlog” of cases from the 80s and 90s, when it had very poor policies (often trying to handle abuse cases “in-house” through repentance, with the bad results we’ve learned to expect), is still coming out, but I think it’s doing much better today.

    I certainly wouldn’t call what the church does a “gold standard,” since protecting the church from liability seems at least as high a priority as protecting children, but its policies (for preventing and handling new cases) seem pretty effective now, for the most part.

  6. profxm says:
    June 6, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    kuri, good to know. I left in 2002 and, while I try to stay abreast of general happenings in the religion for my research, subtle changes like abuse policies are not things I’ve been able to follow. I sure hope they are doing a better job, for the childrens’ sake.

  7. Megan Thompson says:
    June 25, 2021 at 4:58 am

    I think here you can find what to do in such situations https://lawrina.com/blog/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mormon Alumni Association Books

Latest Comments:

  1. Cara B. Klein on My conspiracy theory #2April 26, 2025

    Wow, I had never thought about it in that way before You have really opened my eyes to a new…

  2. chanson on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 16, 2025

    The haiku at the end is lovely. Sounds like a great book!

  3. Donna Banta on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    I imagine anyone who has tried to change the church from within will identify with Kitchen's story. I especially like…

  4. Johnny Townsend on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    This was a painful review to read. For many years, I held the same hope, that the LDS church would…

  5. LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binaries – Main Street Plaza on It’s Time to Vote for the 2024 Brodie Awards!!!April 14, 2025

    […] sincere acceptance is not a priority. Fortunately, this is what he exemplifies in his memoir, the Brodie-nominated Boughs of…

8: The Mormon Proposition Acceptance of Gays Add new tag Affirmation angry exmormon awards Book Reviews BYU comments Conformity Dallin H. Oaks DAMU disaffected mormon underground Dustin Lance Black Ex-Mormon Exclusion policy Excommunicated exmormon faith Family feminism Gay Gay Love Gay Marriage Gay Relationships General Conference Happiness Homosexual Homosexuality LDS LGBT LGBTQ Link Bomb missionaries Modesty Mormon Mormon Alumni Association Mormonism motherhood peace politics Polygamy priesthood ban Sunstone temple

Awards

William Law X-Mormon of the Year:

  • 2023: Adam Steed
  • 2022: David Archuleta
  • 2021: Jeff T. Green
  • 2020: Jacinda Ardern
  • 2019: David Nielsen
  • 2018: Sam Young
  • 2017: Savannah
  • 2016: Jeremy Runnells
  • 2015: John Dehlin
  • 2014: Kate Kelly
  • 2013: J. Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson
  • 2012: David Tweede
  • 2011: Joanna Brooks
  • 2010: Monica Bielanko
  • 2009: Walter Kirn

Other Cool Sites!

WasMormon.org
©2025 Main Street Plaza | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes