The Utah State Legislature is currently drafting a bill for housing and employment nondiscrimination for LGBTs statewide after months of closed door discussions.Â Good, right?
If that’s a sticking point, that does not bode well.Â Has such a thing ever been done before, where individual adherents of faiths have been made exempt from civil rights laws, as opposed to just religious institutions?Â Basically, that would mean any and all private property would be exempt — say, a business or apartment complex owned by a Mormon.Â That’s a shockingly major step backward from what passed in Salt Lake City in 2009.
Let’s be clear here about the Church’s goals.Â The Church only supported the SLC law because it explicitly made the Church exempt.Â The Church does not support nondiscrimination in employment or housing, as it will fire any BYU teacher who has a same-sex relationship.Â The Church only supports nondiscrimination in the sense that it supports others’ beliefs in the public sphere (as per Article of Faith #11); the ultimate goal is to “spread the Gospel” and, frankly, a gay-friendly public sphere is an impediment to that.Â So, if you can’t fight the gay-friendliness (the plurality), then you fight the publicness and expand the private sphere (and call it “religious freedom”).
Sure, there would still be nondiscrimination if you work for the city park or live in state-subsidized housing, but the private sphere (where most jobs and housing exists) would be exempt.Â The entire private sphere, mind you.
I seriously hope this sticking point does not stick because if it does, it would be a travesty.Â I assume what we’ll probably (hopefully) see is an expansion of the SLC model to the state level, or something along those lines.Â But I just want folks to be clear about what the Church (or at least, some Church representatives) are aiming for.