Skip to content
Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Sunday in Outer Blogness: Miracles and Tragicles Edition!

chanson, March 1, 2009October 1, 2011

Pixelfish reports a tragicle: the death of Paul Harvey. She and her readers reminisce about listening to “The Rest of the Story” — I know that for me it brings back plenty of memories of the long drive to seminary, at 5 a.m., in the still-freezing car when the weather was twenty below. Good times! In the miracles department, we have a couple of stories that could be straight out of fast-and-testimony meeting: Bull has an unexpected twist of good fortune, and Susan Mercedes experienced an unexpected chromatic alignment. The only odd thing is that the authors don’t seem to view these events as confirming the hand of the divine.

In the non-miracle department, Jonathan Blake found a cogent explanation of evolution, especially meant to overcome a lot of the misinformation that’s floating around. (Also, don’t miss the non-miracle of Jonathan’s deconversion.) And Christopher Smith had an interesting run-in with an LDS historian who found his critique of Nibley’s work to be “un-academic” because the LDS historian “felt that an ‘academic perspective’ will ignore or suspend pro/con debates about faith and historicity.”

In the religion department, Andrew tackles the truly hilarious argument that Mormonism can’t be Christian because it is a religion. PhillyChief reports that Catholics are urging citizens to vote for secular candidates. Well, in India that is. Not in Christian countries of course! Says Philly: “They know all too well what happens when one religion is in charge, it generally makes life rough for the other religions, but secularists? Well they’re your best shot at a fair shake.” So true. If you’re confused about your own religious position, you can take this helpful quiz to discover whether your morals align with the moral teachings of the Bible (weirdly, it doesn’t seem to cover how to swear an oath).

But let’s not just pick on the religious people — Brent Rasmussen offers a list of suggestions on how to be an atheist, including popular atheist pastimes such as “Call the Pope ‘Pope Ratty McRatty-Rat’, and his vehicle the ‘Popemobile'”, and “When debating creationists, roll your eyes a lot and sigh.”

And, of course, you know the title of this edition comes from one of my favorite satirical videos: Give God Some More Credit!

Sunday in Outer Blogness

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Sunday in Outer Blogness: Onward into 2017 edition!

January 8, 2017

We are smack dab in the middle of awards season here at Main Street Plaza! If you have not yet voted for X-Mormon of the year 2016, this week is your last chance — do it here! Also, I’ve just cleaned up the categories and added my own nominations for…

Read More

Sunday in Outer Blogness: Surviving Edition!

June 2, 2013

I’m looking forward to hearing what happens at the Pride Parade, especially considering the controversy! If it’s not too late, here‘s a guide for straight allies. Sometimes marriage comes just in time!! Yet sometimes surviving is a bit more complex. Whether you’re surviving a new culture, a religious upbringing and…

Read More

Sunday in Outer Blogness: Server Failure Edition!

December 7, 2014

Yes, we had a bit of a server problem. Not here at Main Street Plaza, fortunately! But rather at the ol’ day job, the one that pays Main Street Plaza’s server bills. It wasn’t that big a deal, but… with my other jobs (making sure my kids bathe and get…

Read More

Comments (6)

  1. Hellmut says:
    March 1, 2009 at 8:46 am

    When religious authorities pronounce empirical truth claims, of course, historians have an obligation to test such statements.

    In fact, Christ’s advice was to determine false prophets by their fruits. That admonition implies two statements:

    1. Believers can tell the difference between good and bad fruit.
    2. Fruits are observable.

    The latter means that prophetic fruits are subject to empirical investigation.

    At least when it comes to false prophets, there is no difference between the ‘Christian’ and the rational methodology.

    Other religions might be less concerned with empiricism but it is a feature of Christianity.

    Joseph Smith made any number of statements that are beyond the direct scope of empirical inquiry. However, Smith also proclaimed a multitude of truth claims that can be empirically tested.

    Bushman was quite clear. He believes because he desires to believe. His faith validates his parents and his relationship with them.

    That is not history. It is identity validation.

    Christ’s admonition about the false prophets means that inquiry takes precedence over faith. Any demand to suspend the standards of academic inquiry is an indication of a lost cause.

  2. chanson says:
    March 1, 2009 at 8:55 am

    You’re talking about Christopher Smith’s history article, right? I agree, and thought it would be an interesting debate to highlight. 😉

  3. Sabayon says:
    March 1, 2009 at 9:00 am

    I have yet to meet anyone, even devout Catholics, who do not call the Pope’s vehicle the “Popemobile”. It’s just what it’s called.

  4. chanson says:
    March 1, 2009 at 9:45 am

    That’s what it’s really called? It’s still funny, lol.

  5. Christopher Smith says:
    March 1, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    >>“When debating creationists, roll your eyes a lot and sigh.”

    You don’t have to be an atheist to do that. You just have to have an IQ above 15. 😉

    As usual, thanks for the link!

  6. chanson says:
    March 2, 2009 at 5:19 am

    lol. 😀

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mormon Alumni Association Books

Latest Comments:

  1. Cara B. Klein on My conspiracy theory #2April 26, 2025

    Wow, I had never thought about it in that way before You have really opened my eyes to a new…

  2. chanson on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 16, 2025

    The haiku at the end is lovely. Sounds like a great book!

  3. Donna Banta on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    I imagine anyone who has tried to change the church from within will identify with Kitchen's story. I especially like…

  4. Johnny Townsend on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    This was a painful review to read. For many years, I held the same hope, that the LDS church would…

  5. LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binaries – Main Street Plaza on It’s Time to Vote for the 2024 Brodie Awards!!!April 14, 2025

    […] sincere acceptance is not a priority. Fortunately, this is what he exemplifies in his memoir, the Brodie-nominated Boughs of…

8: The Mormon Proposition Acceptance of Gays Add new tag Affirmation angry exmormon awards Book Reviews BYU comments Conformity Dallin H. Oaks DAMU disaffected mormon underground Dustin Lance Black Ex-Mormon Exclusion policy Excommunicated exmormon faith Family feminism Gay Gay Love Gay Marriage Gay Relationships General Conference Happiness Homosexual Homosexuality LDS LGBT LGBTQ Link Bomb missionaries Modesty Mormon Mormon Alumni Association Mormonism motherhood peace politics Polygamy priesthood ban Sunstone temple

Awards

William Law X-Mormon of the Year:

  • 2023: Adam Steed
  • 2022: David Archuleta
  • 2021: Jeff T. Green
  • 2020: Jacinda Ardern
  • 2019: David Nielsen
  • 2018: Sam Young
  • 2017: Savannah
  • 2016: Jeremy Runnells
  • 2015: John Dehlin
  • 2014: Kate Kelly
  • 2013: J. Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson
  • 2012: David Tweede
  • 2011: Joanna Brooks
  • 2010: Monica Bielanko
  • 2009: Walter Kirn

Other Cool Sites!

WasMormon.org
©2025 Main Street Plaza | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes