So says a court in Arkansas. I know lawyers are necessary, but since when do they believe they can determine the answer to longstanding theological, historical, and sociological questions? Oh well… I guess the next time someone asks if Mormonism is Protestant you can cite actual legal precedent when saying no. 🙂
Related Posts
Does Advertising Campaign Enhance or Dilute Mormon Brand?
Guest post by Rex Whisman. Republished with permission. [Note from Chino Blanco: Cross-posted here because I’ve just finished listening to Kyle Monson’s “Publicity, Advertising, & the New Mormon.org” at BCC, and reading Kaimi Wenger’s “The Angel and the Internet” at Times & Seasons, and I think Rex’s questions might provide…
In which I ponder the nature of existence…
Watching a special about Christopher Columbus a few weeks ago, I was struck by the importance of names. What a place is named – who decides what something gets to be named. In Christopher Columbus’ case, he renamed places that already had names – giving them European names. Some of…
How to deconvert ’em just enough…
DMI Dave recently wrote a piece on how to be a good anti-Mormon. His first recommendation? “be a good Christian.” I have to agree with Dave on this one since — although atheists famously can’t speak for one another — I don’t think any self-respecting atheist would choose to be…
When I was a kid, I was taught that Mormonism isn’t just a branch of Protestantism.
Well, the court sort of has to determine if Mormonism is Protestant in order to adjudicate the parties’ claims. Is the court institutionally competent to do so? You could argue no, but it sounds to me like a question of fact, and courts always have tp determine difficult questions of fact. And law.
It’s what they do.
So, in your opinions, do you think Mormonism is a Protestant religion? Did the court get this wrong?
Of course it isn’t Protestant.
We try to establish an ecclesiarchy under a centralized Priesthood structure, we call all their religions apostate, and introduce a whole slew of new doctrines.
Now any one of those, on it’s own, might not do the trick. But put them altogether and it’s pretty clear that we are no more Protestant than the Pope is.
Could the Maxwell Institute be considered Protestant?
In my opinion, the question can be decided more narrowly, Seth. Mormons are not Protestants because we are not even Niceans. The restoration of the priesthood excludes us.
Most other churches accept each others credentials. Mormons, however, cannot possibly link up with St. Peter’s succession in the Roman Catholic sense.
Instead we claim an alternative succession myth to Peter. Most Protestant churches proclaim the priesthood of the faithful rather than an authority account. However, most Protestant ministers happen to link up wit the bishop of Rome.
Yeah, but this seems uncontroversial to me. I was always taught, quite officially, that we weren’t Protestant and damn proud of it. 😉
Exactly!