Skip to content
Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Personal Responsibility for Conflating Love with Cruelty

Johnny Townsend, July 16, 2023July 16, 2023

Some of my closest family members treat me badly because their church tells them to. I long tried to excuse them because I remembered when I was deceived by the LDS church as well.

Then I remembered I Corinthians 10:13, “There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able,” and I realized that at some point, we’re all responsible for our own abusive behavior, no matter what cultural mindset we’ve been immersed in.

When I assigned my students Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery,” many were shocked and outraged to imagine a society that could act as cruelly as the one depicted in the story. Then I asked if they could imagine a future historian looking back on our time and saying the same thing. “What do we do routinely in our culture someone else might consider unacceptable in the future?”

After some heated discussion, students suggested head injuries in football, boxing matches, and horse racing. Others then suggested boiling lobsters alive or big game trophy hunting. Next came a lack of universal healthcare, long prison sentences for non-violent drug offenses, and forcing students to take on decades of student loan debt.

Subsidizing fossil fuel corporations and the destruction of our climate.

The students began thinking, which is all a teacher can really hope for.

But if my students could begin reassessing acceptable morality after one short story and a single class discussion, we’re all in a position to do at least a minimal amount of self-reflection.

As a Mormon missionary in Rome, I was assigned to guide “greenies,” new missionaries who’d just arrived from the U.S. When one of them wasn’t performing at a level my zone leaders deemed acceptable, I was ordered to hound the man until he got in line.

In this closed, cult-like culture, peer pressure and conformity were powerful forces, but I simply couldn’t follow the directives of my leaders. I instinctively knew it was wrong to treat my missionary companion badly. If he was sinning, that was his prerogative. After all, in the Pre-Existence when Lucifer offered to force everyone to be good, Heavenly Father rejected that plan.

So when modern LDS leaders—apostles and prophets—urge members of their church to disinherit their children who don’t attend services faithfully, when they urge members not to accept their children’s same-sex partners, when they urge members to behave in other cruel ways, those church leaders are responsible for leading their followers to sin. But those followers are responsible for agreeing to commit those sins.

“There is beauty all around when there’s ‘tough love’ at home.”

Doesn’t quite have the same ring as the popular hymn. And justifiably so.

Mormons discount Brigham Young’s acceptance of slavery because “he was a man of his times.” But even in the time of Brigham Young, there were abolitionists who could look past societal norms. He was responsible for choosing not to do so.

Cruelty is cruel, no matter who tells us otherwise. Shrugging off our personal responsibility when we hurt family members—or complete strangers—cannot be the guiding principle in the lives of people who hope to become gods.

Of course, it’s easy for me to see the flaws of my family members who treat me badly. That’s hardly a stretch. Their behavior is blatantly obvious.

What’s harder is to examine the ways I’m also conflating love with cruelty, or complacency with cruelty, or ignorance with cruelty.

We can’t turn into paragons of 100% virtue overnight, but we can tackle one blind spot at a time and become a tiny bit better as human beings rather than excusing every cruelty just because others do. We can choose to be conscious of and responsible for our personal behavior.

Our devout family members may be tempted by LDS leaders and LDS culture to behave cruelly, they may be directly led to cruelty, but they’ll never tempted or led beyond what they can resist. That’s according to their own doctrine, so we can hold them to it.

And we can stop giving them a pass just because they give themselves one.

Ethics Family Cruelty

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Peace, Order and Religious Freedom

November 4, 2008November 10, 2008

In the wake of the reformation Europe was torn by religious wars for almost two centuries. France had the Huguenot wars, Britain the civil war between king and parliament, and in Germany, there was the 30 year war, which killed one third of the population. My home town was the…

Read More

Mormon Moment Series on poetrysansonions.blogspot.com

October 7, 2012

Ahhhhh! The smell of fresh, juicy, slightly wrong Mormon blog posts. It must be Sunday! I have been doing a series of posts related to Mormon and Post-Mormon issues that seem to be *hot* this year. With more and more people interested in Mormons, and now the change in rules…

Read More

That’s It! I’m Going Back!

February 25, 2008October 20, 2010

I just finished scrolling through the reader responses to the Danzig affair in the Trib. Granted, it’s the Salt Lake Tribune and not the Deseret News but I have to admit that I am shocked. May be, it’s just me but the tone of the discussion seems to have changed….

Read More

Comments (3)

  1. chanson says:
    July 16, 2023 at 8:01 am

    Great insights! I feel like this post has so many great discussion topics embedded in it (e.g. can you think of any other things that are normal today that might be seen as shockingly cruel by future generations?)

    On a personal level, this ties in with my most recent post. I have a relationship that has deteriorated because the other person did something cruel — and we can resolve the issue because they refuse to talk about it. They won’t even admit they’re refusing to talk about it (which might open a discussion as to why), but instead use an endless stream of rhetorical games to evade the question and shut down the discussion before it can happen.

    It reminded me of the “Young Women’s Values” song that I was taught in LDS church as a teenager: “I understand the meaning of ‘accountability’ — every choice for good or ill is my responsibility.”

    I’m not sure how this works, but somehow it seems like they think that if you’re teaching someone a lesson through tough love, you don’t have to justify it, explain it, or even acknowledge that you did it…

  2. Donna Banta says:
    July 16, 2023 at 8:25 am

    Thanks for this, Johnny. Kindness really isn’t that difficult!

  3. @Monya_PostMo says:
    July 16, 2023 at 10:07 am

    Yes! And I think what unites these questions is the need for thinking and curiosity. If people let themselves be curios about someone’s life, they hold off on the condemnation and, often, the cruelty. And both of these enforce conformity, so of course cultures that depend on conformity cast curiosity (aka questioning aka ‘doubting’) as a threat. Thanks Johnny!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mormon Alumni Association Books

Latest Comments:

  1. termal kamerayla su kaçak tespiti on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesJune 21, 2025

    termal kamerayla su kaçak tespiti Ekip çok organize, kaça?? an?nda bulup çözdüler. https://bence.net/read-blog/25188

  2. Cara B. Klein on My conspiracy theory #2April 26, 2025

    Wow, I had never thought about it in that way before You have really opened my eyes to a new…

  3. chanson on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 16, 2025

    The haiku at the end is lovely. Sounds like a great book!

  4. Donna Banta on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    I imagine anyone who has tried to change the church from within will identify with Kitchen's story. I especially like…

  5. Johnny Townsend on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    This was a painful review to read. For many years, I held the same hope, that the LDS church would…

8: The Mormon Proposition Acceptance of Gays Add new tag Affirmation angry exmormon awards Book Reviews BYU comments Conformity Dallin H. Oaks DAMU disaffected mormon underground Dustin Lance Black Ex-Mormon Exclusion policy Excommunicated exmormon faith Family feminism Gay Gay Love Gay Marriage Gay Relationships General Conference Happiness Homosexual Homosexuality LDS LGBT LGBTQ Link Bomb missionaries Modesty Mormon Mormon Alumni Association Mormonism motherhood peace politics Polygamy priesthood ban Sunstone temple

Awards

William Law X-Mormon of the Year:

  • 2023: Adam Steed
  • 2022: David Archuleta
  • 2021: Jeff T. Green
  • 2020: Jacinda Ardern
  • 2019: David Nielsen
  • 2018: Sam Young
  • 2017: Savannah
  • 2016: Jeremy Runnells
  • 2015: John Dehlin
  • 2014: Kate Kelly
  • 2013: J. Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson
  • 2012: David Tweede
  • 2011: Joanna Brooks
  • 2010: Monica Bielanko
  • 2009: Walter Kirn

Other Cool Sites!

WasMormon.org
©2025 Main Street Plaza | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes