Skip to content
Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Mormons aren’t racists, huh?

profxm, November 11, 2012November 11, 2012

It turns out that when you actually quantify racism, Mormons are tied at #4 (with North Dakota) behind only Alabama (#1), Mississippi (#2), and Georgia (#3). Some researchers geo-located and tallied racist tweets in light of the election and Mormon-dense Utah didn’t fare so well. You can see the map here.

Granted, this is a specific situation – a white, Mormon candidate for president was clobbered by a mixed race though African American identifying candidate. Mormon hopes were dashed, and the latent racism came out in buckets. Time to rethink the idea that Mormons aren’t particularly racist.

Race

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Why the Curse of Cain remains in the Mormon imaginary

March 17, 2011March 17, 2011

Have any of you read Black and Mormon? The authors explain why even though present-day Church leaders have said “NO, NO, NO!” about the curse of Cain folklore, why Mormons like Jason and even his stake president continue to believe and espouse it. It’s not just racism and/or residual notions…

Read More

SUNSTONE’S Motherhood Issue

July 5, 2012July 5, 2012

This entry is cross-posted at Self-Portrait As. I recently edited issue 166 of SUNSTONE magazine, aka “the motherhood issue.” I am proud and happy to announce that it is SUNSTONE’s most popular and best-selling issue. It has far outstripped all other issues in terms of people ordering individual copies, while…

Read More

animated Mormon quotes – Brigham Young on race

February 26, 2012February 26, 2012

In a caffeine addled state during a long drive I had an idea: Wouldn’t it help people who are interested in Mormonism to “see” what past Mormon leaders have said, rather than just read it? That thought lead to another: Well, you could animate historic Mormon figures to reenact the…

Read More

Comments (6)

  1. chanson says:
    November 12, 2012 at 5:16 am

    Very interesting! However, I’d take it with a bit of a grain of salt for the following reason:

    If we look at people’s racism in terms of a normal distribution (bell curve) what they’re measuring is the handful of people who fall on the extreme racist end — people who are so confident in their racism that they think it’s a good idea to post tweets calling the president a “nigger”.

    But there’s some randomness in exactly where the extreme points lie. As the people in the article mentioned, having even one person more or one person less who’s at once a big racist and a big Twitter fan can change the results by a lot.

  2. Chris F. says:
    November 12, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    Oregon got a special mention also. I think Oregon is an interesting case though. We have a decent amount of Mormons, and we also have a decent amount of rural Republicans. I’m kind of a wolf among the sheep as a left leaning independant who lives in a highly mormon rural area.

    I’ve seen the cover of Wall Street Journal the day after the election ( http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323894704578105031877259720.html ), and it fascinated me. It had a map of the United States, made such that you could see the counties, and then showed the election results for each county. It showed that Obama pretty much won all the highly populated areas, but lost everywhere else. I do find it intersting that Obama won all for of the candidates’ home states.

  3. kuri says:
    November 12, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    @2, Racism is complicated in Oregon. On the one hand, there’s a long history of racism here, including a really strong KKK presence during the 1920s. On the other hand, Oregon was one of only five states where a majority of white males voted for Obama in 2012.

  4. Chris F. says:
    November 12, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    @3, Yes, I remember lectures about that in college. If I remember correctly, there was a resurgence of their power in the 50’s and 60’s. They almost gained control of Portland back then.

  5. Ren says:
    November 18, 2012 at 9:43 am

    Interesting. Regarding Oregon, I was under the impression there’s a fairly strong skinhead presence there. At least, that’s what I recall from news stories in the 90s. Is that still the case?

    These days it has a reputation more for a more liberal bent which Portandia satirizes and we (in Minneapolis) are in a perpetual battle with Portland for title of most bike friend city.

    While the twin cities are extremely liberal, there are outlying areas of MN which have extremely racists and anti-lgbt elements. I’ve seen some horrible posts/tweets from some Minnesotans that make me cringe. And sadly, yes, this state is home of congresswoman Michele Bachmann.

    Speaking to the whole issue of those who vocalize blatantly racist views, it’s disturbing. Such views have always been around but in my lifetime as a GenXer, they seemed to become much less prevalent and even if someone felt that way (think rural, older relatives), they didn’t announced their views to strangers. For people to vocalize it to the world, it seems like that would be motivated by unbridled anger and a dash of stupidity. That’s a dangerous combination.

  6. Chris F. says:
    November 19, 2012 at 11:59 am

    As far as I can tell, though we do have skinheads and other racists (I’m sure some closet Klan members are out there), they are not really a movement with any real power. There may be a hate crime here and there, but I haven’t heard of any real movement to pass any blatantly racist legislation or to put an outspoken racist into a governing position.

    We have the ocational problem with police shooting black people and homeless people, but procedures dealing with that have gotten stricter.

    On a side note, Portland claims that it is pulling ahead in the “bike friendly” race, by installing the first bike counter in North America on the Hawthorne Bridge. I’m not sure how relivant that is, but it sounds important.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mormon Alumni Association Books

Latest Comments:

  1. Donna Banta on A pox on the PoX policy, ten years onNovember 5, 2025

    If Oaks meant to imply anything by picking a counselor with a gay brother it was, "See, we can hate…

  2. @Monya_PostMo on A pox on the PoX policy, ten years onNovember 5, 2025

    See post and comments at Latter Gay Stories - heartbreaking! No loving God was involved in that policy https://www.facebook.com/search/top?q=latter%20gay%20stories

  3. chanson on A pox on the PoX policy, ten years onNovember 5, 2025

    I remember when the PoX was rolled out, and the tales of its horrible effects. So, now I guess same…

  4. @Monya_PostMo on A pox on the PoX policy, ten years onNovember 5, 2025

    Oaks reasoned that if preference wasn't built into the law, all of society could move toward homosexual marriage and could…

  5. MikeyB on on “American Trinity”November 4, 2025

    Awesome post! Really enjoyed reading it.

8: The Mormon Proposition Acceptance of Gays Add new tag Affirmation angry exmormon awards Book Reviews BYU comments Conformity Dallin H. Oaks DAMU disaffected mormon underground Dustin Lance Black Ex-Mormon Exclusion policy Excommunicated exmormon faith Family feminism Gay Gay Love Gay Marriage Gay Relationships General Conference Happiness Homosexual Homosexuality LDS LGBT LGBTQ Link Bomb missionaries Modesty Mormon Mormon Alumni Association Mormonism motherhood peace politics Polygamy priesthood ban Sunstone temple

Awards

William Law X-Mormon of the Year:

  • 2023: Adam Steed
  • 2022: David Archuleta
  • 2021: Jeff T. Green
  • 2020: Jacinda Ardern
  • 2019: David Nielsen
  • 2018: Sam Young
  • 2017: Savannah
  • 2016: Jeremy Runnells
  • 2015: John Dehlin
  • 2014: Kate Kelly
  • 2013: J. Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson
  • 2012: David Tweede
  • 2011: Joanna Brooks
  • 2010: Monica Bielanko
  • 2009: Walter Kirn

Other Cool Sites!

WasMormon.org
©2025 Main Street Plaza | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes