Skip to content
Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

“Nobody actually believes in a man with a beard in the clouds.”

Leah, April 15, 2011April 15, 2011

A friend of mine said this recently as we were discussing whether the god that New Atheists dismiss is too simplistic.

All I could say is, “Well, I did.”

Okay, maybe not in the clouds exactly, but from his first appearance with his Son to Joseph Smith to the affirmation in Doctrine and Covenants 130 that he has a tangible body, the Mormon conception of God as I understood it was that God was beyond the shadow of a doubt, a man, the Father of our spirits. And not only was he in our image and we in his, at one time he was a mortal like ourselves. (For all the debate about whether or not this is official doctrine, this is what I learned in Sunday School and seminary. So if it’s not official doctrine, CES dropped the ball.)

I always wondered about what our Heavenly Father was like when he was going through his own earthly progression. Was he whatever the equivalent of a Utah Mormon on his planet would have been (I really hoped he wasn’t)? Or was he one of those hip California Mormons? I kind of imagined he might have been like my seminary teacher that I really admired, kind, intelligent, accepting, the epitome of my ideal of Christlike.

I’ve written about how my parents took a very literal approach to Church doctrine. That became problematic for me when I went to college and learned about things like evolution. One question that bothered me was, At what point along the evolutionary path did humanoid creatures become children of God as opposed to just animals? Was there a magic cutoff line? I couldn’t see how the Adam and Eve story could fit, and if that wasn’t real, a lot of other Church doctrine collapsed for me. I admire those who take a less black and white approach and sometimes wish I’d gotten a more nuanced view of things.

I don’t believe it anymore, but I still find it a beautiful idea that we humans are all the offspring of divinity with the potential to become divine ourselves. “Beloved child of God” was a label that positively impacted how I saw and interacted with people in my everyday life.

I don’t believe in Elohim or Kolob anymore, yet I can’t deny that I had experiences that I view as sacred in connection with those ideas. After a time of considering myself atheist and even anti-religious, I’m grappling with new ideas and reconsidering what God could be. The images of God that I had frankly seem absurd to me now and much of the reason why I took the label “atheist” was because I didn’t want anyone thinking I believed in that God, but I’ve come to a place where the word “God” once again feels relevant and meaningful to me. Perhaps the images I had were incomplete or accurate, but they sure seemed an effective gateway to Something, and it’s a Something that I’m not done exploring.

Testimony

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Reflections on An Overwhelming Emptiness

April 4, 2011January 9, 2025

About ten days ago, I published a post on my blog (invictuspilgrim.blogspot.com) entitled An Overwhelming Emptiness. It was Daves story, the story of his struggle to come to terms with his sexuality and identity in a Mormon mixed-orientation marriage (MoMoM). Then, on Wednesday of this past week, I published another…

Read More
Testimony Seeing the back of Angel Moroni

Should I stay or should I go – and why?

December 15, 2021December 15, 2021

Research project on why people leave the Church should also explore reconciliation My mind began whirling when Jana Reiss announced she and her research partner Benjamin Knoll were launching an in-depth project to see why Mormons leave and have left the Church. (See here for the Kickstarter announcement). It’s an…

Read More

The Toll: Inside a Mormon Mixed-Orientation Marriage

March 19, 2011March 18, 2011

Losing you [when you joined the church] was like a guillotine blade that beheaded the loving richness I had in my life. [After you joined the church] I saw you withdraw from life. The relationship between your withdrawal from life and your involvement in the church appeared to be proportionally…

Read More

Comments (10)

  1. simplysarah says:
    April 15, 2011 at 11:53 am

    Great post. I can completely relate to everything you’ve written (though I still prefer the atheist label).

  2. Leah says:
    April 15, 2011 at 12:45 pm

    Thanks, Sarah!

  3. Robert Hagedorn says:
    April 15, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    Before we can discuss the tree of knowledge of good and evil we must first know exactly what this tree and its fruit were. Do a search: The First Scandal. Then click twice.

  4. Parker says:
    April 15, 2011 at 4:25 pm

    What do you see as the solution to your conundrum of wanting to believe in a God, but not particularly caring for any of the existing versions?

  5. Carlos says:
    April 16, 2011 at 5:34 am

    I think that the process is a learning curve. And through this process you will go back and forth until you find the truth. That is the process that your own mind goes through with learning. I feel that at the core of the universe there are a group of laws that without the need of a supreme being make everything work. For instance the law of justice in which a person is rewarded for what he or she does good or bad does not need of a supreme being to be implemented. It simply is. At the core of the universe there are these croup of laws that make the world go forward, and there is no need for a supreme being to control these laws.

  6. Leah says:
    April 16, 2011 at 7:18 am

    Parker, I don’t know that I’m done exploring all the existing versions. I linked to a great article the other day quoting Karen Armstrong as saying, “God is not a being at all.” I’m reading the work of various mystics in various faiths through the ages. There are vast interpretations about what God could or might be that have been around for a long time. They just aren’t interpretations that I happened to have any exposure to growing up Mormon.

    Carlos, my response to Parker kind of goes along with your thoughts as well. There are some who think that those core laws of the universe are themselves God without any sort of personal intelligence at the helm. Could very well be. Some people object to calling natural laws God. Either view is fine with me. I just think I cut off my exploring prematurely. It may be that after more exploring, I’ll conclude that there’s Nothing after all. Even now, I don’t think that what I’m looking for is any sort of being. I think the human faces we’ve attached to god(s) throughout history (even the Mormon view of God) represent different facets of something much bigger and more complex. None of these anthropomorphic views is “wrong,” exactly, but none of them alone is an adequate representation either. I discussed this in more detail on my personal blog.

  7. TGD says:
    April 16, 2011 at 9:01 am

    I don’t really label myself anything but I’m fascinated by the idea of labels as they pertain to personal identity.
    Great post.

  8. Leah says:
    April 16, 2011 at 9:32 am

    Thanks, TGD.

  9. wayne says:
    April 18, 2011 at 7:37 pm

    I have always liked the concept of Brahman, myself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahman

    As for God or no God, in thought I am more of an atheist, in practice well I am a pragmatist. The question does not matter to me. If I am with a group of people who are praying I pray too.

  10. Leah says:
    April 21, 2011 at 9:05 am

    wayne, thanks! The idea of Brahman appeals to me as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mormon Alumni Association Books

Latest Comments:

  1. termal kamerayla su kaçak tespiti on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesJune 21, 2025

    termal kamerayla su kaçak tespiti Ekip çok organize, kaça?? an?nda bulup çözdüler. https://bence.net/read-blog/25188

  2. Cara B. Klein on My conspiracy theory #2April 26, 2025

    Wow, I had never thought about it in that way before You have really opened my eyes to a new…

  3. chanson on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 16, 2025

    The haiku at the end is lovely. Sounds like a great book!

  4. Donna Banta on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    I imagine anyone who has tried to change the church from within will identify with Kitchen's story. I especially like…

  5. Johnny Townsend on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    This was a painful review to read. For many years, I held the same hope, that the LDS church would…

8: The Mormon Proposition Acceptance of Gays Add new tag Affirmation angry exmormon awards Book Reviews BYU comments Conformity Dallin H. Oaks DAMU disaffected mormon underground Dustin Lance Black Ex-Mormon Exclusion policy Excommunicated exmormon faith Family feminism Gay Gay Love Gay Marriage Gay Relationships General Conference Happiness Homosexual Homosexuality LDS LGBT LGBTQ Link Bomb missionaries Modesty Mormon Mormon Alumni Association Mormonism motherhood peace politics Polygamy priesthood ban Sunstone temple

Awards

William Law X-Mormon of the Year:

  • 2023: Adam Steed
  • 2022: David Archuleta
  • 2021: Jeff T. Green
  • 2020: Jacinda Ardern
  • 2019: David Nielsen
  • 2018: Sam Young
  • 2017: Savannah
  • 2016: Jeremy Runnells
  • 2015: John Dehlin
  • 2014: Kate Kelly
  • 2013: J. Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson
  • 2012: David Tweede
  • 2011: Joanna Brooks
  • 2010: Monica Bielanko
  • 2009: Walter Kirn

Other Cool Sites!

WasMormon.org
©2025 Main Street Plaza | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes