Skip to content
Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Overlapping Cultural Mormon Perspectives

chanson, December 10, 2008December 10, 2008

Faithful Mormons often imagine that those commenting on Mormonism from outside their circle form one monolithic block of “antis”. Mormon culture encourages this view, so people are often surprised when they read the discussion on the Internet and find that the people who disbelieve Mormonism occasionally agree with the Mormons more than they agree with each other. But, really, is it any wonder?

Here’s a little Venn diagram I drew up, based on my experience with LDS-interest discussion on the Internet:

Mormon Perspectives

Christianity civil discourse Community

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Building on a Religious Background

October 26, 2011October 26, 2011

The following is an article I wrote for the October / November 2011 issue of Free Inquiry (the magazine of the Council for Secular Humanism), reposted here with permission from the editors. The Oct/Nov issue is a special issue on Mormonism, and one other MSP regular also contributed to it….

Read More

Resurrection

April 14, 2007April 14, 2007

Killing my blog was one of the most painful experiences I’ve had in my postmormon existence. For whatever reason, I could not write what I thought without hurting my wife deeply, and when things reached a decision point, I decided that I wouldn’t write if I couldn’t write whatever I…

Read More

Fiction at Main Street Plaza

March 29, 2007January 15, 2011

Coming soon to a browser near you, Main Street Plaza will be publishing fiction! Our first published piece will be “Love, Mormon Style,” by Bob Bringhurst. “Love, Mormon Style” was originally published in a short fiction anthology called In Our Lovely Deseret: Mormon Fictions. This is a humorous yet poignant…

Read More

Comments (10)

  1. Andrew S says:
    December 10, 2008 at 9:32 am

    I was reading an entry from the Liberal Mormon That Could (it seems…be rather faithful and not New Order-ish)…and even though I think she stretched out her concerns, when she talks about culture vs. tradition vs. doctrine, I think she very neatly fits into the yellow, white, and magenta overlaps of a faithful mormon…so isn’t that interesting?

    I think she is a little too charitable, but at least, for example, she seems uncertain about the claim “When the Brethren have spoken, the thinking is done.” So…that’s a similar question to: “What is right?” in “do what is right, let the consequences follow.”

  2. Matt says:
    December 10, 2008 at 10:48 am

    Yum. Glad you included Outer Blogness as the background shade that makes the colors and the text stand out so sharply. We are beneath all, around all, within all. đŸ˜‰

  3. Hellmut says:
    December 10, 2008 at 6:52 pm

    Great graphic, Chanson. I would not fit on this graph because Mormon principles led me right out of the Mormon Church. Desiring to live the gospel principles, unfortunately, I cannot be part of any efforts to reenact Galileo Galilei during our life time.

    In my experience, the white core “do what is right” no longer overlaps with the faithful red domain.

  4. Andrew S says:
    December 10, 2008 at 9:21 pm

    But I think that’s exactly why we have a non-religious Cultural Mormon track.

    You can leave the church, which is just a small part of the culture, but you can’t say goodbye to a lifetime.

    And I look at the overlapping sections at having two parts: underneath the underscore is the question that allows people to break from TBM positions. Everyone wants to “do what is right and let the consequences follow” — but the underlying question is: what is right? And then if you also apply to the overlap between nonreligious cultural mormon and an other faith believer, you can realize, “Well, I don’t agree with the church…but are any other churches better?”

  5. chanson says:
    December 10, 2008 at 10:54 pm

    Andrew — Very interesting link! It’s true that what she’s saying fits in that circle.

    Matt — lol, I didn’t really mean for the black to be Outer Blogness, but I guess that’s a possible interpretation. đŸ˜‰

    Hellmut — Andrew’s right about the interpretation of the diagram. It was your principles that led you out of the Mormon Church, but others believe they’re doing what’s right by staying in. I’m not granting that those who “follow the prophet” are doing what is right, but I will grant that they believe that they’re doing what is right.

    All three groups agree on the statement above the line (that you should do what is right), but disagree on the answer to the question below the line: what is right?

  6. Hellmut says:
    December 11, 2008 at 6:21 am

    That would mean that your graphic is not a venn diagram. Is that right?

    In a venn diagram, you would have to be a member of all three domains to be in the white intersection.

  7. chanson says:
    December 11, 2008 at 6:36 am

    It’s a venn diagram of how the perspectives intersect. So an idea that fits into all three viewpoints goes in the white intersection.

    The lower half of each section indicates points of disagreement, so that part might not really be a venn diagram, unless it’s possible to have a negative venn diagram… đŸ˜‰

  8. aerin says:
    December 11, 2008 at 7:08 am

    In the other faith believer – it’s interesting that they wouldn’t have an option to also believe that mormonism was a part of their heritage or family. I’m thinking of someone who has left the mormon faith, joined another faith, but still somehow “claims” mormon heritage or culture. Maybe they like green jello or roadshows or something.

  9. chanson says:
    December 11, 2008 at 7:30 am

    Aerin — Of course some do. It’s my impression, though, that taking on a new faith identity and especially a new faith community has a strong effect of canceling out one’s emotional/identity connection with Mormonism. Additionally, the Christian “Ministry to Mormons”-type sites tend to have a mix of exmo Christians (many of whom were raised mainstream Christian) along with Christians who have never been Mormon.

    Nonreligious people who discuss Mormonism online are almost exclusively people who have been Mormon and/or have a strong personal/family connection with Mormonism.

  10. gus o kahan says:
    November 28, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    In you graph there seems to be no notation for Mormon Mendacity.

    God does no play dice but love game theory
    A new species discovered by counter-apologist.

    It’s called the Viagra Mormon, it’s easy to find just search Mormon Viagra.
    Yes the newly discovered species (yet unnamed) has a considerable stash of mormon viagra pages. Lets call them the Mormon Viagra Archives.
    Search image or text: Mormon Viagra
    Yes you will get: Best viagra Blog Archive Best viagra
    note: Show more results from http://www.bloggerofjared.com
    for more results you can expand the list of pages even further.
    Yes, there are 174 pages of Mormon Viagra Archives.
    Question:
    just click on the cache for the source of this profligate religious promiscuity.
    How do other Mormons feel about this need to hide, lie, deceive, obscure, unwanted fact Is there a pattern here?
    What pillar sustains such mendacity?
    What Mormon Species is this? Will the character of Mormonism be improved?
    Is, site:www.bloggerofjared.com mormon viagra a market trend? ?Where is the foundation of the pillar that sustains such mendacity?
    Will there be peace by consensus or is it to win at any cost; is this the new path to enlightenment?

    Im embarrassed to be the one to direct your attention to the enemy within. ?I will postulate, its all about the Religion Making Business.
    There blogger Jared lies on the second page, slowly slipping from sight.

    Jettboy has edited all his blog entries to reflect the beatific, the pure of heart, the elect and the one whos being watched.
    Jettboy has a new identity: The straight and narrow blog
    His new baby is scrubbed and clean of any comment that conflicts with The straight and narrow.
    I guess that why its called The Straight and Narrow Blog,

    http://jettboy.blogspot.com/
    STRAIGHT AND NARROW BLOG
    As they say, open up the windows, let the bad air out.? http://scari.org/mormon-hapless.html

    gok

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mormon Alumni Association Books

Latest Comments:

  1. Cara B. Klein on My conspiracy theory #2April 26, 2025

    Wow, I had never thought about it in that way before You have really opened my eyes to a new…

  2. chanson on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 16, 2025

    The haiku at the end is lovely. Sounds like a great book!

  3. Donna Banta on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    I imagine anyone who has tried to change the church from within will identify with Kitchen's story. I especially like…

  4. Johnny Townsend on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    This was a painful review to read. For many years, I held the same hope, that the LDS church would…

  5. LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binaries – Main Street Plaza on It’s Time to Vote for the 2024 Brodie Awards!!!April 14, 2025

    […] sincere acceptance is not a priority. Fortunately, this is what he exemplifies in his memoir, the Brodie-nominated Boughs of…

8: The Mormon Proposition Acceptance of Gays Add new tag Affirmation angry exmormon awards Book Reviews BYU comments Conformity Dallin H. Oaks DAMU disaffected mormon underground Dustin Lance Black Ex-Mormon Exclusion policy Excommunicated exmormon faith Family feminism Gay Gay Love Gay Marriage Gay Relationships General Conference Happiness Homosexual Homosexuality LDS LGBT LGBTQ Link Bomb missionaries Modesty Mormon Mormon Alumni Association Mormonism motherhood peace politics Polygamy priesthood ban Sunstone temple

Awards

William Law X-Mormon of the Year:

  • 2023: Adam Steed
  • 2022: David Archuleta
  • 2021: Jeff T. Green
  • 2020: Jacinda Ardern
  • 2019: David Nielsen
  • 2018: Sam Young
  • 2017: Savannah
  • 2016: Jeremy Runnells
  • 2015: John Dehlin
  • 2014: Kate Kelly
  • 2013: J. Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson
  • 2012: David Tweede
  • 2011: Joanna Brooks
  • 2010: Monica Bielanko
  • 2009: Walter Kirn

Other Cool Sites!

WasMormon.org
©2025 Main Street Plaza | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes