Skip to content
Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

rape statistics in Utah

profxm, May 16, 2007May 16, 2007

I was preparing some presentations for one of my classes today and looked up rape rates by city in the U.S. (from fbi.gov) to give my students a better understanding of what rape rates are like where we live. While I was at it I took a quick look at Utah, capital of Mormondom, to see what things looked like:

City rapes per 100,000 women population
Sandy 30.1 93,013
South Jordan 31.55 38,031
Spanish Fork 33.89 23,609
Orem 34.93 91,607
St. George 42.07 61,795
Cedar City 43.53 22,973
Draper 46.84 34,156
Kaysville 53.38 22,482
Tooele 62.4 28,844
Logan 68.01 47,052
Lehi 75.39 26,530
Salt Lake City 78 184,627
Springville 80.96 22,232
American Fork 86.42 23,142
Bountiful 89.28 42,561
Roy 93.16 36,498
Murray 98.24 44,789
Ogden 98.56 81,166
Clearfield 99.48 28,145
Layton 101.16 63,269
Provo 106.81 102,983
West Valley 152.82 116,477
Midvale 200.5 27,930
South Salt Lake 395.77 22,235

I only included the cities with populations over 20,000 as one or two rapes in smaller populations can mess up the rate calculations. Just so you have a sense of what you’re seeing, my rape rate calculation is a little fudged as the FBI doesn’t include the number of women in a given population, just the total population. I divided the population in half when calculating the rates to get the rate for women (as almost 100% of rapes are of women; less than 2% of men are ever raped). Also, the national average in 2002 (the above data is from 2005) was 66 rapes per 100,000 women, so you can compare Utah with the rest of the nation.

Rape obviously occurs in Utah (surprise, surprise), but Utah doesn’t have rape rates that are generally that much higher than most other states. I don’t know whether there should be concern or not over Midvale and South Salt Lake, with rape rates more than three times the national average; it really depends on whether that is a consistent rate over time or not. If it is unusual for those cities (e.g., 2005 was a really bad year), that makes a difference.

Keep in mind I’m not saying Mormons are any more or less likely to engage in rape. The city with over 100,000 in population with the highest incidence of rape is Minneapolis, MN (213 rapes per 100,000 women), not a hotbed of Mormonism by any stretch.

Science

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

splitting souls

November 8, 2007

I recently attended an academic conference where one of the presenters made a point about Catholic doctrine I found particularly humorous. The speaker mentioned that Catholicism teaches that the “soul” enters the “body” at conception (I knew that, of course, but he went on…). Technically, at that point, it’s just…

Read More

Who knew the spirit is so smart?

October 8, 2007October 20, 2010

I caught this Daily Herald summary of General Conference and one point stood out to me: Apparently Richard G. Scott is of the opinion that the “spirit” can reveal “absolute truths.” Here’s the quote from the news report: Elder Richard G. Scott of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles discussed…

Read More

Adventures in online Mormonism. Or, my search for Truth.

March 18, 2007October 20, 2010

This is a trip down memory lane, with some conclusions about the nature of truth. I recently decided to archive and forget my old Mormon-related web sites. AmberAle asked me for some dates regarding when they were created. This led to a stream of rambling reminiscences. So it seemed like…

Read More

Comments (3)

  1. aerin says:
    May 20, 2007 at 1:21 pm

    I think it’s important to note – I would assume that these stats are from reported rapes. Who knows how many go unreported for whatever reason.

    I will say, that attitude itself towards rape is not healthy – in the sense of, a person would be better off dead than without honor. And being raped is without honor (I think this is in SWK’s Miracle of Forgiveness).

    With that said, this is very interesting.

  2. Glenn says:
    May 21, 2007 at 6:22 am

    I hope this doesn’t come across as insensitive or calous, but I have met women in the church (my wife was once one of them) who believe that their garments would protect them from being raped. That has always concerned me. I know you can’t really make a connection between these statistics and how many victims were garment wearers, but anything to help dispel that folk belief, however widely or narrowly held it might be, would be a good thing in my estimation.

  3. exmoron says:
    May 21, 2007 at 7:58 am

    Aerin… According to one source I have, only 1 in 5 rapes by strangers are reported and only 1 in 20 rapes by someone the victim knows are reported. So, underreporting is a serious issue – these numbers probably underestimate the rapes that actually occurred by a factor of five to 10 (that means you can multiply the number of rapes by 5 or 10 to get a sense of how many are actually occurring). Current estimates indicate that women in the U.S. have a 1 in 4 chance of being raped during their lifetimes.

    Glenn, I’ve never heard that one. That’s amazing! You’re absolutely right, garments do not protect against rape, any more than they protect against bullets or anything else that can penetrate “regular” clothes. I don’t have the actual statistics, but if we assume that there is no difference between Mormons and non-Mormons in Utah in who gets raped, somewhere around 60% of the above rapes were of LDS women, and of those, somewhere around 20% would be of temple endowed women (50% of rapes of women occur before the age of 18, so I’m assuming only 40% of Mormon women over 18 are temple endowed). That would be, of course, a fascinating thing to study, though getting that data would be very difficult.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mormon Alumni Association Books

Latest Comments:

  1. Cara B. Klein on My conspiracy theory #2April 26, 2025

    Wow, I had never thought about it in that way before You have really opened my eyes to a new…

  2. chanson on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 16, 2025

    The haiku at the end is lovely. Sounds like a great book!

  3. Donna Banta on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    I imagine anyone who has tried to change the church from within will identify with Kitchen's story. I especially like…

  4. Johnny Townsend on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    This was a painful review to read. For many years, I held the same hope, that the LDS church would…

  5. LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binaries – Main Street Plaza on It’s Time to Vote for the 2024 Brodie Awards!!!April 14, 2025

    […] sincere acceptance is not a priority. Fortunately, this is what he exemplifies in his memoir, the Brodie-nominated Boughs of…

8: The Mormon Proposition Acceptance of Gays Add new tag Affirmation angry exmormon awards Book Reviews BYU comments Conformity Dallin H. Oaks DAMU disaffected mormon underground Dustin Lance Black Ex-Mormon Exclusion policy Excommunicated exmormon faith Family feminism Gay Gay Love Gay Marriage Gay Relationships General Conference Happiness Homosexual Homosexuality LDS LGBT LGBTQ Link Bomb missionaries Modesty Mormon Mormon Alumni Association Mormonism motherhood peace politics Polygamy priesthood ban Sunstone temple

Awards

William Law X-Mormon of the Year:

  • 2023: Adam Steed
  • 2022: David Archuleta
  • 2021: Jeff T. Green
  • 2020: Jacinda Ardern
  • 2019: David Nielsen
  • 2018: Sam Young
  • 2017: Savannah
  • 2016: Jeremy Runnells
  • 2015: John Dehlin
  • 2014: Kate Kelly
  • 2013: J. Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson
  • 2012: David Tweede
  • 2011: Joanna Brooks
  • 2010: Monica Bielanko
  • 2009: Walter Kirn

Other Cool Sites!

WasMormon.org
©2025 Main Street Plaza | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes